NFPA Journal discusses who is responsible for identifying sprinkler system design deficiencies

While it seems like common sense for inspectors to identify sprinkler system design deficiencies, they are not part of the scope of NFPA 25, Water-Based Fire Protection Systems. From an inspection standpoint, NFPA 25 is not a design evaluation standard, a differentiation that often leaves people scratching their heads. While design deficiencies can create serious life safety concerns and have contributed to the failure of water-based fire protection systems, it is important to understand where these issues should be documented, and by whom. To find out who is responsible, read "Too Much of a Good Thing?" by Matt Klaus in the latest issue of NFPA Journal.

Comments

[Harrington Group, Inc.]

Part of the problem is awareness. No one complains about fire protection system malfunctions, but when fire protection systems don’t work, the results can be catastrophic. Too often, building owners don’t even know there is an existing problem. In the meantime, HVAC systems that keep people comfortable receive considerable attention because of the complaints that flood in when it isn’t working. Fire systems don’t have that sort of urgency with tenants; they just assume their fire protection system is being properly maintained and will work when the time comes.

Hiring high-quality inspectors at average market prices or above is a good start to avoiding many potential headaches. Ideally, building owners would also hire fire protection engineers to carry out periodic walk-throughs and review inspection, testing, and maintenance records for the fire protection systems to make sure their tenants and building stay safe.

[Hard Fire]

"Fire systems don’t have that sort of urgency with tenants; they just assume their fire protection system is being properly maintained and will work when the time comes."

Amen.